بنو ہاشم کے لئے زکوٰۃ: فقہی آراء کا تجزیاتی مطالعہ:

Naseem  Mahmood; Abdul  Aleem

doi:10.54692/abh.2023.08322049

Naseem Mahmood Postdoctoral fellowship, IRI, IIU, Islamabad/ Faculty, Department of Islamic Thought and Civilization, UMT, Sialkot https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8887-6709
Abdul Aleem Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Thought and Civilization, University of Management and Technology, Sialkot

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54692/abh.2023.08322049

Keywords: Hashmies, Charity, Compulsory, Optional, Livelihood, Juristic Approaches

Abstract

All social members belong to the different economic status and zakat and other charities in Islamic economic system are specified for the poor and needy persons of the Muslim state. The people belonging to the family and tribe of Holy Prophetﷺ, called Hashamies of Banu Hashim, also reside in this world and naturally they are also devided into different economic classes. Holy Prophetﷺ prohibited his family members receive the charities from the Muslim wealth and declared their right in Ghaneemah, the wealth of the enemies left in the battlefield. It was only to ensure their respect and dignity in the society. But in the contemporary world no such fund has been specified for such people who are poor and needy persons in the society. If donations are not allowed for them, they are unable to earn the money, and no opportunity is available for the satisfaction of their daily needs then how they will be able to survive? Keeping in view such situations, Islamic jurists are of three opinions. Firstly it is absolutely prohibited them, secondly it is absolutely allowed for them and according to thirdly the compulsory charities are prohibited for them and they are allowed to enjoy the optional charities. This research paper is an analytical study of the juristic approaches and their argumentations. After the analytical review of the conclusive approach and its justification it has been discussed in detail to be adopted for practice in present era.

References

1. Muslim Bin Hajjāj Al-Qushīrī, Al-Jāmi`-ul-Sahīh, Kitāb-ul- ẓakāt, Bāb-o-Tahrīm-il-ẓakāt `alā Rasūl-Illāh-e-Wa `alā Aālihī Wa Hum Banū Hāshim Wa Banū Muṭṭalib Dūna Ghaīrihim (Dār-ul-Tabā`at-il-`āmirah, Turkīā, 1334 AH),3/117, Hadith No.1069.
2. Al-Taūbah, 9: 60
3. `alāū-ul-Dīn `alī Bin Husām-ul-Dīn Al-Muttaqī, Kanz-ul-`ummāl Fī Sunan-il-Qal-e-Wal Af `āl, Kitāb-ul- ẓakāt, Bāb-o-`āmil-il-Sadaqah(Muassat-ul-Risālah, 1981)6/568, Hadith No.16962.
4. Abū Dāwūd Sulīmān Bin Ash`ath Al-Sajistānī, Al-Sunan, Kitāb-ul- ẓakāt, Bāb- ul-Sadaqah `alā Banī Hāshim(Dar-ul-Risālat-il-Risālat-il-`ālamīīah, Bīrūt, 1430 AH-2009)3/88, Hadith No. 1650.
5. Abū `Abdullah Muhammad Bin `Abd-ul-Rahmān Al-Damishqī, Rahmat-ul-Ummaht-e- Fī Ikhtilāf-il-A̕immah, Kitāb-ul- ẓakāt, Fasl wajma`ū `alā Tahrīm-il-Sadaqat-il-Mafrūdhah `alā Banī Hāshim(Dar-ul-Kutub-il-`ilmīīah, Bīrūt,1408 AH-1987AD),88.
6. Muhammad Bin `Abdul Wāhid Kamāl-ul- Dīn, Fath-ul-QaDīr, Bāb-o- Man īajūzu Lahū Daf`-ul-Sadqah Wa Mna Lā ajūz (Maktabat-ul-Rashīdiīīah, Quetta), 2/213.
7. Muhammad Ahmad Badr-ul-Dīn `īnī, `umdat-ul-Qārī(Dār-ul-Fikr, Bīrūt),9/7.
8. Abū `Abdullah Muhammad Bin Ahmad Qarṭabī, , Al-Jāmi` Li Ahkām-il-Qur’ān (Dār-ul-Kutub-il-Misriīīah, Al-Qāhirah,1384 AH-1964 AD),8/191.
9. Abū Ja`far Ahmad Bin Muahammad Al-Tahāvī, Sharah Ma`ānī-ul-Aāthār, Kitāb-ul- ẓakāt, Bāb- ul-Sadaqah `alā Banī Hāshim (Educational Press,Karachi, 1970),1/347.
10. Badr-ul-Dīn `īnī, `umdat-ul-Qārī(Dār-ul-Fikr, Bīrūt),9/81.
11. Abū Ja`far Al-Tahāvī, Sharah Ma`ānī-ul-Aāthār, 1/352.
12. Badr-ul-Dīn `īnī, `umdat-ul-Qārī(Dār-ul-Fikr, Bīrūt),9/81.
13. Muhammad Anwar Shāh Kashmiri, Faidh-ul-Bārī `alā Sahih-il-Bukhārī (1938), 3/52.
14. Abū Ja`far Al-Tahāvī, Sharah Ma`ānī-ul-Aāthār, 1/352.
15. Muhammad Anwar Shāh Kashmiri, Faidh-ul-Bārī `alā Sahih-il-Bukhārī, 3/52.
16. Badr-ul-Dīn `īnī, `umdat-ul-Qārī(Dār-ul-Fikr, Bīrūt),9/81.
17. Al-Qarṭabī, , Al-Jāmi` Li Ahkām-il-Qur’ān,8/91.
18. Ahmad Bin `alī Ibn-e-Hajr `asqalanānī, Fath-ul-Bārī (Dār-ul-Ma`rifah, Bīrūt, 1379AH), 3/354.
19. Ahmad Bin `alī Ibn-e-Hajr `asqalanānī, Fath-ul-Bārī, 3/354.
20. Muhammad Anwar Shāh Kashmiri, Faidh-ul-Bārī `alā Sahih-il-Bukhārī, 3/52.
21. Taqī-ul-Dīn Ibn-e-Taīmiīīah, Majmū`-ul-Fatāwā, (Dār-ul-Fikr, Lil-Tabā`ah Wal Nashr Wal Taūzi`), 4/456.
22. Nafs-ul-Marja`
23. Abū Dāwūd, Al-Sunan, Kitāb-ul- ẓakāt, Bāb- ul-Faqīr īahdī Lil Ghanīī-e- Min-al-Sadaqh,3/90, Hadith No. 1654.
24. Zafar Ahmad `uthmānī, I`lāuū-ul-Sunan (Dār-ul-Qur’ān Wal `ulūm-il-Islāmīīah, Kārchī),9/80.
25. Abū Ja`far Al-Tahāvī, Sharah Ma`ānī-ul-Aāthār, 1/352.
26. Jalāl-ul-Dīn `Abd-ul-Rahmān Al-Suīūṭī, Al-Ashbāh Wal Naẓāir(Dar-ul-Kutub-il-`ilmīīah, 1403 AH-1983AD),84.
27. Muhammad Amīn Ibn-i-`ābidīn, Radd-il-Muhtār `alā-al-Durr-il-Mukhtār (Maktabah Mājidīīah, 1399 AH), 1/211.
28. Al-Baqarah,2: 173۔

بنو ہاشم کے لئے زکوٰۃ: فقہی آراء کا تجزیاتی مطالعہ

Hashmis’ Entitlement for Zakat: Analytical Study of Juristic Opinions

Abstract

References