حضرت ابو بکر صدیق رضی اللہ عنہ کی قلت روایت سے متعلق اعتراضات کاتجزیاتی مطالعہ

Analitical Study of Objections on Ḥadhrat Abu Bakr Siddiq's Qillat Rewāyat

Abstract

As a source of Islamic law, the word Ḥadīth  is not a necessary introduction in academic circles. It has fundamental importance in Islām. The companions of The last Prophet used to say by name, "Did we see the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) doing this?" Sometimes they used to say that we used to do this during the time of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) and sometimes it happened that the companions' religious deeds were considered a sign of the teachings of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). When the knowledge of Ḥadīth  became embedded in books and writings, it did not require hard work in memorizing it orally and copying it, which was very important from a religious and scholarly point of view before the formal editing of this knowledge. But this does not mean that the principle of oral transmission and tradition does not remain, but it is a fact. It continued to be transmitted to the living disciples, but this natural rotation of circumstances and the principled convenience of the writings of Ḥadīth  left only oral memory behind, collections of Ḥadīth s were prepared, guidance was obtained from the Ḥadīth  after the Qur'an. If there was room for doubt, the companions of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) would have been consulted. Despite this, mu'tarzin left no stone unturned to prove to you the disbelievers.