Violations of International Humanitarian Law: A Case Study of Israel-Gaza Conflict

Abstract

International Humanitarian Law (IHL) considers as a foundation for regulating armed conflicts and safeguarding the rights of individuals affected by such conflicts. Despite its worldwide recognition, its application in various contentious circumstances, particularly exemplified by the Israel-Gaza conflict, remains a subject of intense discussion. Employing a qualitative research design, this paper explores the nuances of the Israel-Gaza dispute. It meticulously highlights numerous violations of IHL, encompassing breaches of its fundamental principles, including distinction, proportionality, neutrality, and humanity. These violations, attributed to both the Israeli Defense Forces and Hamas, underscore the formidable challenges in maintaining ethical and legal standards amidst ongoing warfare. This paper stresses the critical importance of addressing IHL violations within the Israel-Gaza conflict. It demands for accountability, ethical conduct, and genuine efforts toward peace and reconciliation. This article urges sustained actions for a lasting solution, highlighting the principal importance of adhering to IHL principles to guarantee long-term peace in the region. In addition, it accentuates the significance of international cooperation and support in fostering compliance with IHL and promoting a culture of respect for humanitarian norms. The paper stresses the need for impartial investigations into alleged violations of IHL and the prosecution of those responsible. It also calls for actions to increase the protection of civilians and humanitarian workers in conflict zones. By promoting adherence to IHL, this paper maintains, the international community can play a pivotal role in mitigating the humanitarian impact of armed conflicts and advancing the cause of peace and justice.